Security automations for code review, vulnerability discovery, dependency updates and drift checks.
Documented by AgentCV from public sources — not submitted by this team.
Not claimed by or endorsed by the team or its organization. Metrics are cited only as the sources state them; absent metrics render as [unknown].
Sources: Securing our codebase with autonomous agents (cursor.com)
Is this your team? Claim it · Ask us to remove it
Recent activity
Version cuts and proof, newest first — the living track record.
Spec sheet
The benchmark fields — designed for comparison across teams.
- Topology
- Other
- Agent count
- [unknown]
- Listed members
- 4
- Platform
- Custom
- Runs on
- Custom ×4
- Industries
- [unknown]
- Task kinds
- [unknown]
- Trust tier
- Self-Reported
- Proof entries
- 1
Topology & roster
System wiring
Node details
Typical Other layout — schematic, not verified wiring
HumanHuman operatorHuman gate
- Tool
- Human operator
- Autonomy
- Human-gated
- directs → Agent
BuilderAgent
- Tool
- Agent
- Autonomy
- Runs autonomously
- commits to → Shared workspace
- directs ← Human operator
ResourceShared workspace
- Tool
- Shared workspace
- Autonomy
- Runs autonomously
- commits to ← Agent
Automation story
self-reportedCursor describes security agents operating on its own codebase using Cursor Automations. The four listed members cover pull-request security review, existing-code vulnerability searches, dependency patching and security-property drift monitoring. This is a curated summary of Cursor’s March 2026 account, not an owner-submitted registration. The listed members are not a claim about the total fleet size. Custom and other are registry mappings rather than the source’s platform or topology labels.
How a typical Other team handles a task
Typical Other layout — schematic, not verified wiring
Task arrives
Human operator directs Agent.
Agent builds the work
Agent builds the work.
The artifact lands
The artifact lands in Shared workspace: Agent contributes via "commits to".
Human holds the last word
Human operator holds final approval.
Replicate a typical Other setup
Typical Other layout — schematic, not verified wiring
Ingredients
- HumanHuman operator
- BuilderAgent
- ResourceShared workspace
Setup order
- 1.Provision the substrate: Shared workspace.
- 2.Wire Agent: it receives "directs" from Human operator.
- 3.Declare the human gate: Human operator holds final approval.
4 listed members: the members the cited sources name. The total team size is not stated.
Performance metrics
Windowed metrics with provenance. [unknown] means it was not tracked — an honest hole beats an invented figure.
No metrics on record yet.
Token economics
Cost transparency is part of the honesty architecture. [unknown] means it was not tracked — not that it is zero.
Proof (1)
The team's shared track record — tasks, incidents, lessons, milestones. Per-entry provenance tags are always visible.
- ArtifactMar 16, 2026self-reported
Securing our codebase with autonomous agents
Public source cited for this curated profile. Published 2026-03-16; accessed by AgentCV 2026-10-24.
https://cursor.com/blog/security-agents
Sign in to add a proof entry.
Sign inAttestations (0)
Named third-party statements from people with first-hand experience. Attestations are what separates Peer-Attested from Evidence-Linked.
No attestations yet. Worked with this configuration or agent? Attest to it using the form below — attestations are named third-party statements and are what separates Peer-Attested from Evidence-Linked.
Sign in to attest to this team.
Sign in