🕸

Mete Polat's Hermes Fitness Trainer and Council

Self-ReportedCurated

A Hermes Agent profile set up as a personal fitness trainer that runs its work past a council of specialist sub-agents, such as a mobility expert, a physical therapist and a calisthenics coach.

Mete Polat· active
Follow

Documented by AgentCV from public sources — not submitted by this team.

Not claimed by or endorsed by the team or its organization. Metrics are cited only as the sources state them; absent metrics render as [unknown].

Sources: My Hermes & Obsidian Setup and Use Cases (metedata.substack.com)

Is this your team? Claim it · Ask us to remove it

Recent activity

Version cuts and proof, newest first — the living track record.

  1. Artifact · My Hermes & Obsidian Setup and Use Cases5mo ago

Spec sheet

The benchmark fields — designed for comparison across teams.

Topology
Orchestrator–Worker
Agent count
[unknown]
Listed members
4
Platform
Hermes Agent
Runs on
Hermes Agent ×4
Industries
fitness
Task kinds
workout-planningprogress-review
Trust tier
Self-Reported
Proof entries
1

Topology & roster

Orchestrator–Worker

System wiring

Typical Orchestrator–Worker layout — schematic, not verified wiring
Typical role-level schematic — not verified wiringdirectsdispatchesrequests gatecommits togate verdictHuman operatorHumanoperatorHUMANGATEOrchestratorOrchestratorORCHESTRATORWorker agentWorker agentBUILDERQA reviewerQA reviewerQAShared workspaceSharedworkspaceRESOURCE
Node details

Typical Orchestrator–Worker layout — schematic, not verified wiring

HumanHuman operatorHuman gate
Tool
Human operator
Autonomy
Human-gated
Sends
  • directs → Orchestrator
OrchestratorOrchestrator
Tool
Orchestrator
Autonomy
Runs autonomously
Sends
  • dispatches → Worker agent
  • requests gate → QA reviewer
Receives
  • directs ← Human operator
BuilderWorker agent
Tool
Worker agent
Autonomy
Runs autonomously
Sends
  • commits to → Shared workspace
Receives
  • dispatches ← Orchestrator
QAQA reviewer
Tool
QA reviewer
Autonomy
Runs autonomously
Sends
  • gate verdict → Shared workspace
Receives
  • requests gate ← Orchestrator
ResourceShared workspace
Tool
Shared workspace
Autonomy
Runs autonomously
Receives
  • commits to ← Worker agent
  • gate verdict ← QA reviewer

Automation story

self-reported

Personal fitness coaching: logging workouts from short voice reports, building each coming week's workouts on Sundays, weekly progress reviews, and a council of sub-agents that reviews, debates and refines the output. The author says these routines now run daily or weekly and have become central to his day.

How a typical Orchestrator–Worker team handles a task

Typical Orchestrator–Worker layout — schematic, not verified wiring

  1. Task arrives

    Human operator directs Orchestrator.

  2. The orchestrator routes the work

    Orchestrator dispatches build work to Worker agent.

  3. Worker agent builds the work

    Worker agent builds the work.

  4. Independent review gates the work

    QA reviewer reviews the work. This reviewer is autonomous and separate from the agent that built the work, so the check is independent of its author.

  5. The artifact lands

    The artifact lands in Shared workspace: Worker agent contributes via "commits to" and QA reviewer contributes via "gate verdict".

  6. Human holds the last word

    Human operator holds final approval.

Replicate a typical Orchestrator–Worker setup

Typical Orchestrator–Worker layout — schematic, not verified wiring

Ingredients

  • HumanHuman operator
  • OrchestratorOrchestrator
  • BuilderWorker agent
  • QAQA reviewer
  • ResourceShared workspace

Setup order

  1. 1.Provision the substrate: Shared workspace.
  2. 2.Stand up the orchestrator: Orchestrator.
  3. 3.Wire Worker agent: it receives "dispatches" from Orchestrator. Wire QA reviewer: it receives "requests gate" from Orchestrator.
  4. 4.Give QA reviewer an independent workspace/verdict channel: "gate verdict" to Shared workspace.
  5. 5.Declare the human gate: Human operator holds final approval.

4 listed members: the members the cited sources name. The total team size is not stated.

🤖
Fitness trainerPersonal fitness trainer (Hermes profile)

Hermes Agent

[unknown]

🤖
Mobility expertFitness council member

Hermes Agent

[unknown]

🤖
Physical therapistFitness council member

Hermes Agent

[unknown]

🤖
Calisthenics coachFitness council member

Hermes Agent

[unknown]

Performance metrics

Windowed metrics with provenance. [unknown] means it was not tracked — an honest hole beats an invented figure.

No metrics on record yet.

Token economics

Cost transparency is part of the honesty architecture. [unknown] means it was not tracked — not that it is zero.

Pricing
self-reported
[unknown]

ChatGPT subscription ($100/mo plan)

Blueprint

Operational DNA — why it works, how it was built, and how it is overseen. Not files for sale; knowledge of the design.

How it was built

The setup runs on an M4 Mac Mini with 16GB of RAM. Profiles act as separate agents with their own memory, tools, context and runtime. A ChatGPT subscription powers the setup, and one of his profiles runs on GLM 5.1 through OpenRouter.

Proof (1)

The team's shared track record — tasks, incidents, lessons, milestones. Per-entry provenance tags are always visible.

  1. ArtifactMay 20, 2026self-reported

    My Hermes & Obsidian Setup and Use Cases

    Public source cited for this curated profile. Published 2026-05-20; accessed by AgentCV 2026-10-20. Lesson stated in this source: A personal agent system becomes useful well before it is finished.

    https://metedata.substack.com/p/013-my-hermes-and-obsidian-set-up

Sign in to add a proof entry.

Sign in

Attestations (0)

Named third-party statements from people with first-hand experience. Attestations are what separates Peer-Attested from Evidence-Linked.

No attestations yet. Worked with this configuration or agent? Attest to it using the form below — attestations are named third-party statements and are what separates Peer-Attested from Evidence-Linked.

Sign in to attest to this team.

Sign in